general or art educatio

implemented in general or art education contexts. Like Mayo (2002) and

Giroux (2004b), we see the need to explore specific practices of critical

public pedagogies, in order to understand how they operate.

We find Ellsworth’s (2005) most recent work on public pedagogy helpful in our exploration; she urges critical

educators to explore what she calls

“anomalous places of learning”?museums, public art installations, films,

and other forms of popular culture. We engage with her idea of the

“pedagogical hinge” (p. 5) to examine culture jamming as critical public

pedagogy, and to discover how culture jamming functions as a powerful site

of learning. In addition, we borrow from Ellsworth a way of thinking about

education within popular culture as a process rather than

a product, and seek

to understand how knowledge is created and experienced by the “learning self in the making” (p. 2). To Ellsworth, public pedagogy is most powerful

when it creates “transitional spaces”?when it connects our inner selves to

people, objects, and places outside of ourselves.

This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:24:42 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

CULTURE JAMMING AS CRITICAL PUBLIC PEDAGOGY 327

Finally, we focus on culture jamming groups specifically addressing issues of consumerism and overconsumption, following Reynolds’s (2004) recent call for curriculum scholars to explore work that resists “the brand

name corporate order” (p. 32). Reverend Billy and Adbusters are part of a

wider social movement focused on resisting consumerism and consump

tion that has received little attention among educational researchers; this movement includes groups working toward labor rights, fighting against

the destructive consequences of globalization and advocating for fair trade,

raising awareness about global sweatshops, and fighting against the

eco

logical destruction that accompanies massive overconsumption. This social

movement “attempt [s]

to transform various elements of the social order

surrounding consumption and marketing” (Kozinets 8c Handelman, 2004,

p. 691). While a handful of educators have focused on various social movements that resist consumption (Jubas, 2006; Sandlin, 2005; Sandlin 8c

Milam, 2007; Spring, 2003; Usher, Bryant, & Johnston, 1997), we believe

educators need to pay more attention to consumption, given the increasing role it plays in structuring every aspect of our lives and in fostering gross social and economic disparities (Bocock, 1993; McLaren, 2005).We thus

place our work in the context of recent concerns of critical curriculum

scholars about the increasing power of global corporate hypercapitalism and the imperialism of commercialism which shape the educational mes

sages of popular culture while eradicating any public sphere not controlled

by the market (Giroux, 2003c; McLaren, 2005).

THE CASES OF ADBUSTERS AND REVEREND BILLY AND THE CHURCH OF STOP SHOPPING

We draw from multiple sources of data for this project. Following Ellsworth

(2005), we used secondary data from scholars in other disciplines who have researched and written about culture jamming, and from culture jamming activists who participate in, record, and write about their activism?”the

words and concepts of others”?as “raw material” (p. 13). We also analyzed data from two culture jamming groups, Adbusters and Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping. To examine Adbusters, we gathered textual and visual material from its Web site, including blogs, articles, and “sub

vertisements”; 10 issues of Adbusters magazine published between 2003 and

2006; and a curriculum guide for high school teachers published by Adbusters that focuses on critical media literacy. To examine Reverend

Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping, we gathered textual, visual, and audio material from its Web site, including blogs, MP3s of Reverend Billy’s “sermons,” photographs, and public performance “scripts” written by Rev

erend Billy. We also examined two recent documentaries (Post 8c Palacios, 2006; Sharpe, 2001) containing interviews with Reverend Billy, footage of Reverend Billy enacting performance interventions, and footage of

This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:24:42 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

328 JENNIFER A. SANDLIN AND JENNIFER L. MILAM

Reverend Billy preaching in various venues. Finally, we examined Reverend

Billy’s recent autobiography (Talen, 2003). We sought in our analysis to make sense of how culture jamming oper

ates as curriculum. Duncombe (2002) explains that when analyzing cultural resistance, one must examine four aspects: the content of the

resistance, the form it takes, the ways it is interpreted, and the activities of its creation. We viewed the various forms of data we gathered?including

visual, written, and performative?as “cultural texts,” and drawing upon

McKee’s (2003) approach to interpretive cultural textual analysis, we

sought to understand how culture jammers viewed and critiqued the world

around them, how they created alternative visions of the world, and how

they articulated these visions to others. To further understand culture

jamming as curriculum, we also drew upon ethnographic

or qualitative

media analysis (Altheide, 1987,1996), which focuses on the ethnography of

cultural texts and consists of the “reflexive movement between concept

development, sampling, data collection, data coding, data analysis, and

interpretation” (Altheide, 1987, p. 65). Altheide (1987) further explains that this type of analysis is embedded in constant discovery and constant

comparison, but seeks to go beyond description of the content of texts, to

arrive at understanding of broader social discourses created by and

reflected in the texts.

Adbusters is a magazine produced by the Adbusters Media Foundation.

Based in Vancouver, Canada, Adbusters describes itself as “a global network

of artists, activists, writers, pranksters, students, educators and entrepre neurs who want to advance the new social activist movement of the infor

mation age. Our aim is to topple existing power structures and forge

a

major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century” (Adbusters Media

Foundation, n.d.). The content of Adbusters focuses on two main themes?

how marketing and mass media colonize space, and how global capitalism

and rampant consumption are

destroying natural environments (Rumbo,

2002). Adbusters magazine (Figure 1) is a

reader-supported, not-for-profit

magazine with an international circulation of 85,000 and contains reader

generated materials, commentaries by activists from across the globe, and

photographs and stories depicting readers’ social activism. Adbusters also

hosts a Web site (http://www.Adbusters.org/) where activists can read

about anti-consumption campaigns; download posters, stickers, and flyers

for distribution; and share information about their own activism. Some of

Adbusters’ ongoing campaigns include Buy Nothing Day (described

earlier) and TV Turnoff Week (a week in April where individuals are

encouraged to take a break from the incessant commercial messages

coming through their televisions by just turning them off; instead of watch

ing TV, Adbusters encourages people to interact with others and become

involved in community activism). Reverend Billy is

an anti-consumption performance

artist based in New

York City, and the leader of the Church of Stop Shopping. Bill Talen, whose

This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:24:42 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

CULTURE JAMMING AS CRITICAL PUBLIC PEDAGOGY 329

J^DBUSTERS

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

stage character is Reverend Billy, adopts the persona of a Southern, con

servative, evangelical preacher?a la Jimmy Swaggart?including pouffy hair and a white suit (Figure 2).

He stages “comic theatrical service [s]” (Lane, 2002, p. 60)?structured as comic church services? with “readings from the saints (or the devils),

public confessions, collective exorcisms, the honoring of new saints, dona

tions to the cause, a lively choir, and a

rousing sermon” (Lane, 2002, p. 61).

This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:24:42 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

330 JENNIFER A. SANDLIN AND JENNIFER L. MILAM

During these services, he acts out a

call-and-response style of preaching as

the audience responds with Amens! and Hallelujahs! Reverend Billy also

performs “retail interventions” in public spaces and retail stores

along with

the Stop Shopping Gospel Choir; some of his popular targets of anti

consumption activism include the Disney Company, Starbucks, Wal-Mart, and Victoria’s Secret. In addition, Reverend Billy writes “intervention

manuals” and scripts that other activists can use in their own public theater

jams.

CULTURE JAMMING AS CRITICAL PUBLIC PEDAGOGY

Our analysis focused on how and why culture jamming activists enact what we

position as critical public pedagogy. Given the