Persons are rational beings
In the course, we’ve looked at many different “concepts of the person”, i.e. ways of defining what it means to be a person / human being. For this paper, I’d like you to reflect on the following question: “Which concept of the person is best for humanity?” This is a very open-ended question. If you’d like more structure, you can compare and contrast your view with the following ideas from the course:
- Aristotle: Persons are rational animals (i.e. they use their awareness and capacity for reflection to shape their own behavior and habits).
- Kant: Persons are rational beings that should strive to have good will (i.e. they are capable of acting not just on their desires but on their conception of what is good)
- Descartes: Persons are primarily minds / “thinking beings”, distinct from bodies
- Searle: Being a person / having mind / consciousness is more than just functioning intelligently
- Locke: A person is essentially a stream of consciousness, responsible only for what he/she is conscious of
- Nagel: Being morally responsible requires free will, and free will is a difficult concept to pin down
- Buddha: Persons are a convenient fiction. Really, the best course is to rid yourself of the illusion that you have a “self”. In the course, we’ve looked at many different “concepts of the person”, i.e. ways of defining what it means to be a person / human being. For this paper, I’d like you to reflect on the following question: “Which concept of the person is best for humanity?” This is a very open-ended question. If you’d like more structure, you can compare and contrast your view with the following ideas from the course:
- Aristotle: Persons are rational animals (i.e. they use their awareness and capacity for reflection to shape their own behavior and habits).
- Kant: Persons are rational beings that should strive to have good will (i.e. they are capable of acting not just on their desires but on their conception of what is good)
- Descartes: Persons are primarily minds / “thinking beings”, distinct from bodies
- Searle: Being a person / having mind / consciousness is more than just functioning intelligently
- Locke: A person is essentially a stream of consciousness, responsible only for what he/she is conscious of
- Nagel: Being morally responsible requires free will, and free will is a difficult concept to pin down
- Buddha: Persons are a convenient fiction. Really, the best course is to rid yourself of the illusion that you have a “self”.