The Cold War has been called by many historians and non-historians alike as one of the most intense events in history. The United States underwent monumental changes during the early years of post World War II(late 1940s early 1950s). Dramatic situations occurred with breathtaking frequency. Were the changes largely were positive? or negative?

/in /by

Later History: 4-5 page Persuasive Commentary
Requirements:
Grading criteria for paper
A. The paper has a clear original thesis or central argument. It is well developed and well structured with a clear topic sentence and a clear transition to the following paragraph and ends with a strong conclusion.
4-5 page persuasive commentary on ONLY ONEof the following assertions
(Limit References to 5-6, if they must be used):
· The Cold War has been called by many historians and non-historians alike as one of the most intense events in history. The United States underwent monumental changes during the early years of post World War II(late 1940s early 1950s). Dramatic situations occurred with breathtaking frequency. Were the changes largely were positive? or negative?
· The Modern Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s was a watershed event that had a profound impact on our nation. More than half a century has passed since a number of monumental events associated with this time in our nation’s history took place. The impact on how the movement affected Black Americans since the late 1960s has been intensely debated. The Modern Civil Rights Movement has produced significant or limited gains for Black Americans?
· Since the 1950s American Popular Culture has deeply impacted our society. Over the past few decades we have seen a plethora of various types of media that have become an integral part of our society. Television, the internet, various forms of music to name. With such ongoing developments has come both praise and criticism. The current state of American Popular Culture has reached a tipping point?
· In 1960 America was introduced to the pill. This was a form of contraception that provided opportunities for American women, in particular, a level of sexual freedom that had previously been denied to them. As the decade and century progressed, various forms of sexual identity and expression emerged in American society. Divorce, Gay men, Lesbian Women, Single people, interracial marriage, adolescent grown men, same sex marriage were just a few of the topics that have dominated the public discourse. Such openness and frankness about sexuality has been the source of contention for some Americans who feel such issues should be kept behind closed doors. American attitudes on sexuality and have become more complicated since the late 1960s?
· American Race Relations have long been etched in the fabric of our nation. From the days that the first Americans landed on the nations shores in the 17th century to the present 21stcentury. Some observers believe that it will be an ongoing issue. There are some who argue that race relations have improved significantly over the past 50 plus years. Others believe that racial communication between different ethnic groups have gotten worse. Race is almost always the subject of intense debate. The fact is that we live in an era where the state of race relations is hard to define?
· Since the 1980s, America has witnessed three decade of unprecedented situations. Such events have had a profound impact on our nation. The AIDS crisis, Ronald Reagan, The Iran Contra-Scandal, deep economic divisions, the fall of communism, the rise of the religious right in politics to name a few events. The 1980s was The 1980s was a decade of certainty?
· Since the early 1990s, has witnessed a number of events, the Clinton years, the expansion of globalization, increasing levels of technology, multiculturalism, the culture wars, numerous sex scandals, September 11, 2001, Mexican Immigration, the racial fallout over Hurricane Katrina, unprecedented redistribution of wealth, the election of the nation’s first Black president among others. Our nation has been able to handle such events with a degree of maturity?

• From the scenario, give a brief summary of Richard Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate Scandal. Explain whether or not you believe that his eventual resignation from office was necessary. Justify your response.

/in /by

“President Nixon and Watergate” Please respond to the following: (Note: Please respond to one [1] of the following two [2] bulleted items in a primary posting of at least 125 words. In addition, please make a substantive comment to one [1] of your classmates.)
• From the scenario, give a brief summary of Richard Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate Scandal. Explain whether or not you believe that his eventual resignation from office was necessary. Justify your response.
• Suggest a better way that Nixon could have responded when he learned about the break-in at the Watergate Hotel’s Democratic headquarters. Provide a rationale for your response.

1. Explain the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Why was it created? 2. Explain the causes of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, and discuss some of the more serious incidents between the two superpowers.

/in /by

1. Explain the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Why was it created?
2. Explain the causes of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, and discuss some of the more serious incidents between the two superpowers.
3. Describe American life as it developed during the 1950s, including social, economic, and political issues, and evaluate the significance of the Cold War in these changes.
4. Explain the rise and effects of McCarthyism in American life.
5. Describe the events that made the build up to the civil rights movement possible.
6. Describe the white South’s reaction to the initial stages of the civil rights movements. Was it all uniform?
7. Explain the differences between Martin Luther King, Jr.’s vision of America and that of Malcolm X.
8. What were some of the major accomplishments of the civil rights movement? What were some of its failures?
9. Discuss Lyndon Johnson’s desire to build a “Great Society” and evaluate the relative success of his programs.
10. Describe the breakthroughs forged by African Americans in the 1950s and the retaliatory movement that came to be called “massive resistance.”
11. Discuss the growth of the “counterculture” in American society during the 1960s, and describe the various movements that began to gather strength as Americans with an agenda sought to have their voices heard.

Vaccines Children are the future. It is the most important that children are provided with a chance for not only a future but also a healthy future. Vaccines have been considered as one of the greatest health developments. Vaccines prevented illnesses, like rubella, diphtheria, smallpox, polio, and whooping cough. “Should any vaccines be required for everyone?” This question is rather ambiguous.

/in /by

Vaccines

Children are the future. It is the most important that children are provided with a chance for not only a future but also a healthy future. Vaccines have been considered as one of the greatest health developments. Vaccines prevented illnesses, like rubella, diphtheria, smallpox, polio, and whooping cough. “Should any vaccines be required for everyone?” This question is rather ambiguous.

Arguments for vaccines

Vaccines can save children’s life. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated that 732,000 American children were saved from death and 322 million cases of childhood illnesses were prevented between 1994 and 2014. The measles vaccine has decreased childhood deaths from measles by 74%.

Vaccines protect future generations. Vaccinated mothers protect their unborn babies from viruses that could potentially cause birth defects. For example, global rubella in 1964-1965, rubella epidemic swept the United State. During that short period time, there were 12.5 million cases of rubella. Twenty thousand children were born with CRS: 11,000 were deaf, 3,500 blind, and 1,800 mentally retarded.

The ingredients in vaccines are safe in the amounts used. Common ingredients, such as thimerosal, formaldehyde, and aluminum, can be harmful in large doses but they are not used in harmful quantities in vaccines. Children are exposed to more aluminum in breast milk and infant formula than they are exposed to in vaccines. Also, the FDA requires up to 10 or more years of testing for all vaccines before they are licensed.

Arguments against vaccines

Despite all the superfluous facts above, vaccines should be considered by all parents whether or not to have a child vaccinated.

Vaccines can cause serious and sometimes fatal side effects. According to the CDC, all vaccines carry a risk of life-threatening allergic reaction in about one per million children. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) says that vaccines may be linked to learning disabilities, asthma, autism, diabetes, chronic inflammation, and other disabilities.

Vaccines contain harmful ingredients. Some physicians believe thimerosal, an organic mercury compound found in trace amounts in one flu vaccine for children and other vaccines for adults, is linked to autism. Aluminum is used in some vaccines and excess aluminum in human bodies can cause neurological harm. Some vaccines for the flu contain chicken egg protein, which can be harmful to children who are allergic to egg.

Vaccines are unnatural, and natural immunity is more effective than vaccination. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia notes that “It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines. Whereas immunity from the disease often follows a single natural infection, immunity from vaccines occurs only after several doses.” Kurt Perkins stated,”Immunity is a natural thing. Vaccines are an artificial thing.”

second classmate

Arguments for and against the use of Vaccines

Vaccines antigenic substances which are prepared using the agents which causes given diseases and used to provide immunity against particular diseases (World Health Organization). In many cases, a vaccine comprises of an agent that looks like the microbe that causes a disease and is usually prepared using killed or weakened form of the microbe, one of its superficial proteins, or toxins. Through the vaccine, the immune system of the body is stimulated to identify the agent as a threat to the body and kill it. The vaccine also prepares the body’s immune system to destroy any such agent or related microbe in future. Different people view vaccines differently, with some supporting their use due to the resulting health benefit while others oppose their use.

ARGUMENTS SUPPORTING THE USE OF VACCINES

Vaccination, particularly in children, ensures that children remain health and free from avoidable illnesses. Through vaccination, children are protected from severe diseases and complications resulting from complications which are vaccine-preventable (Schuchat). If not vaccinated, these complications may lead to limb paralysis and amputation, convulsions, loss of hearing, brain damage and even death.

Through vaccination, a dramatic decrease in infectious disease cases in the United States. However, such diseases are still widespread in other countries and are brought to the U.S. by people visiting America from such countries. Instead of prohibiting such travelers, the most plausible thing to do is subjecting them to tests and subsequent vaccinations. Equally, U.S children can easily contact such illnesses from the visitors or when they travel to risk countries.

Vaccination is the most substantiated and sanctioned method of disease prevention in the United States and the world over. It is safe and very effective since vaccines go through a lengthy and careful analysis by doctors, scientists, and the government just to ensure that they are safe. Further, big medical organizations such as the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Center for Disease Control all endorse the use of recommended vaccinations. Thus, there is no reason why people should be ambivalent about the use of vaccines.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE USE OF VACCINES

Most people who are against the use of vaccines argue from the Biblical or religious point of view. Such arguments are related to the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. Some anti-vaccinationists are of the opinion that in the past, pandemics of infectious diseases such as smallpox have affected populations which are highly vaccinated (Sfetcu).

Many people who are against the use of vaccines have misconceptions about it. For instance, some believe that vaccination causes autism. Others believe that there has not been sufficient research in the field to prove that vaccines are actually safe. However, it is clear that these are just delusions, or fabricated lies made to distract people from using vaccines.

For this Writer’s Notebook assignment, you will be practicing paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. First, you should choose an article that you will be using as a source for your Argument essay. Then, you should find three different pieces of evidence that you might use in your essay as support material. Need 300 words.

/in /by

For this Writer’s Notebook assignment, you will be practicing paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. First, you should choose an article that you will be using as a source for your Argument essay. Then, you should find three different pieces of evidence that you might use in your essay as support material. Need 300 words.

Complete the Writer’s Notebook in 4 steps as explained below:

1. Create a “quotation sandwich” out of one of the pieces of evidence.

2. Paraphrase a different piece of evidence. Include both the original and your paraphrase for comparison.

3. Summarize another piece of evidence. Again, include the original and your summary.

4. Include an in-text citation for each! At the end, be sure to include a Works Cited entry for each source.

My topic is Arguments for and against the use of Vaccines

I should choose at least one source from the library . see link below.

https://dcccd.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-12420191-dt-content-rid-95160835_1/courses/2018SP-ENGL-1301-83420/Finding%2520Research%2520at%2520DCCCD%5B1%5D%281%29.pdf

Sources:

Integrating Sources

Why integrate sources? In academic writing, you will often present claims based on your own research and analysis. In order to prove or advance these claims, you may need to use evidence from sources. Evidence are those things outside of our own mind (facts, figures, reports, books, etc.) that support the reasons we present to make our claim. Integrating information from sources helps you to:

  • Strengthen your own argument / claim / position,
  • Identify others’ ideas, and
  • Establish your ethos / credibility.

When selecting information to use as evidence, it is important to:

  • Utilize the latest, most significant and credible sources that engage with the topic at hand.
  • Use sources to show your readers where you fit in with other writers in the larger conversation about your topic.
  • Use sources that show your readers you are up to date and knowledgeable about your topic.

Ways to Integrate Sources

It is important to know how to effectively integrate sources into your own writing. Generally speaking, there are three ways to integrate sources into your writing.

IntegrateSources

Whenever you integrate sourced information it is important to frame it, which means, you should introduce the information in your own words, insert the sourced information, and follow it with your own interpretation or analysis. A common approach is regularly referred to as the “sandwich approach.”

sandwich

Making Connections

Be sure that your reader understands why you have integrated the sourced information.  To help the reader follow your logic, you should make connections.

  • Point the reader back to the thesis
  • Point the reader back to the paragraph’s main point
  • Point the reader back to your purpose

Revising and Editing Your Text

When you are revising/editing your paper, answer the following questions to ensure that you have effectively integrated your sourced information.

  • Did you use a direct quote?  If so, did you place it within quotation marks?
  • Did you place your parenthetical/in-text citation immediately after your sourced information?
  • Does your citation include all of the required elements?
  • Does the ending punctuation follow the parenthetical/in-text citation?

Citing Integrated Sources

Whenever you integrate sources, you must document the source. Doing so helps to establish credibility and avoid plagiarism.

Generally, parenthetical/in-text citations require the following components:

  • Author’s last name and
  • page number.

Example: (Green 210)

Just as with most things, there are exceptions.

  • Signal Phrase – A signal phrase is an introductory clause that introduces information from sources.  It alerts the reader that you are shifting from your own point of view to someone else’s. When the author’s name is included in the signal phrase, you only need to include the page number in the parenthetical/in-text citation.

Example: According to Charles Green, “televisions are going to have a significant impact on the way people experience the world” (210).

  • Second consecutive use of same source – When using the same source consecutively, you only need to include the page number in the parenthetical/in-text citation.

In Summary

There are three main ways to integrate sources into your paper:

  • Direct quote
  • Summary
  • Paraphrase

Remember:

  • All three methods require citations
  • When integrating sources, it is important to “frame” the information
  • Sourced information should be used as evidence, not to replace your own thoughts or ideas

As you respond to your peers (2 replies, 100 words each), try to fill in any gaps you see in their understanding of the pros and cons of the issue. In addition, evaluate the thesis statement. Does it make a limited and arguable claim about the topic or issue? If not, suggest ways to improve the thesis.

/in /by

As you respond to your peers (2 replies, 100 words each), try to fill in any gaps you see in their understanding of the pros and cons of the issue.  In addition, evaluate the thesis statement.  Does it make a limited and arguable claim about the topic or issue?  If not, suggest ways to improve the thesis.

Peer 1:

Genetically Modified Foods

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), genetically modified foods are those that are obtained from organisms with modified genetic material. Genetic modification involves artificially introducing a desired gene from a different organism into another organism (World Health Organization). Different people have varied viewpoints regarding genetically modified organisms. Those supporting this scientific practice give reasons including, but not limited to, food security, reduction of pesticide use, improved food taste, and enhanced health. Those against genetic modification of foods argue that the practice leads to environmental and health risks, big GMO companies “eating” small scale farmers, and the fact that natural foods have a better taste. Genetic modification is a subject that continues to raise a lot of controversy among different groups of people.

ARGUMENTS FOR GENETIC MODIFICATION OF FOOD

The following arguments have been used to make the idea of genetically modifying food a plausible one.

Food Security. It is expected that by 2050, the world population would hit 9 billion. This means that food production needs to increase so as to meet the demand. Since the size of land for farming is decreasing, genetic modification remains the only option to meet the food demand for the growing population (Cook).

Genetic Modification makes crops stronger and reduces use of pesticides. Through genetic modification, scientists are able to introduce pest resistance genes into food crops. This means that farmers will use little or no pesticides, thus reduced fuel emissions and decreased global warming.

Improved taste. Genetic modification can be done to improve food texture and flavor. For instance, genetically modified corn is sweeter. The technology is also known to produce pepper that is spicier. The flavors of several other foods have been enhanced through genetic modification.

Boosted health. Biotech is known to lead to the production of healthier foods. For instance, genetically modified lettuce has a higher concentration of nutrients and GMO tomatoes have a higher composition of oxidants which help inhibit heart disease or cancer.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST GENETIC MODIFICATION OF FOOD

Despite the arguments made to substantiate the practice of producing GM foods, there are some people who do not buy into the whole idea. Some argue that the benefits of biotechnology is a fabricated story meant to enrich those in the business.

Environmental and health risk. Seeds created through biotechnology are capable of forming pesticide-resistant weeds through cross pollination (Goldstein and Goldstein). These weeds threaten the lives of wild plants other crops. Interfering with crop genes is known to cause defects in animals. For instance, use of biotechnology is known to have led to birth defects and reduction of butterfly populations in the U.S. Mixing up genes of different crops makes them more allergic to people suffering from such. Genetically modified foods could result in antibiotic-resistant diseases, thus reducing medicine effectiveness.

Big companies “eating” small farmers. Farmers who are too much dependent on GMO crops are under the control of businesses owning the patents and thus setting the prices as they wish. Such companies use terminator technologies force farmers to continue buying seeds from GMO companies.

Natural crops tastes better. Food crops which have not been modified taste better and have more nutritional value than genetically modified ones.

Peer 2:

Vaccines

Children are the future. It is the most important that children are provided with a chance for not only a future but also a healthy future. Vaccines have been considered as one of the greatest health developments. Vaccines prevented illnesses, like rubella, diphtheria, smallpox, polio, and whooping cough. “Should any vaccines be required for everyone?” This question is rather ambiguous.

Arguments for vaccines

Vaccines can save children’s life. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated that 732,000 American children were saved from death and 322 million cases of childhood illnesses were prevented between 1994 and 2014. The measles vaccine has decreased childhood deaths from measles by 74%.

Vaccines protect future generations. Vaccinated mothers protect their unborn babies from viruses that could potentially cause birth defects. For example, global rubella in 1964-1965, rubella epidemic swept the United State. During that short period time, there were 12.5 million cases of rubella. Twenty thousand children were born with CRS: 11,000 were deaf, 3,500 blind, and 1,800 mentally retarded.

The ingredients in vaccines are safe in the amounts used. Common ingredients, such as thimerosal, formaldehyde, and aluminum, can be harmful in large doses but they are not used in harmful quantities in vaccines. Children are exposed to more aluminum in breast milk and infant formula than they are exposed to in vaccines. Also, the FDA requires up to 10 or more years of testing for all vaccines before they are licensed.

Arguments against vaccines

Despite all the superfluous facts above, vaccines should be considered by all parents whether or not to have a child vaccinated.

Vaccines can cause serious and sometimes fatal side effects. According to the CDC, all vaccines carry a risk of life-threatening allergic reaction in about one per million children. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) says that vaccines may be linked to learning disabilities, asthma, autism, diabetes, chronic inflammation, and other disabilities.

Vaccines contain harmful ingredients. Some physicians believe thimerosal, an organic mercury compound found in trace amounts in one flu vaccine for children and other vaccines for adults, is linked to autism. Aluminum is used in some vaccines and excess aluminum in human bodies can cause neurological harm. Some vaccines for the flu contain chicken egg protein, which can be harmful to children who are allergic to egg.

Vaccines are unnatural, and natural immunity is more effective than vaccination. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia notes that “It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines. Whereas immunity from the disease often follows a single natural infection, immunity from vaccines occurs only after several doses.” Kurt Perkins stated,”Immunity is a natural thing. Vaccines are an artificial thing.”

For this Writer’s Notebook assignment, you will be practicing paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. First, you should choose an article that you will be using as a source for your Argument essay. Then, you should find three different pieces of evidence that you might use in your essay as support material. Complete the Writer’s Notebook in 4 steps as explained below:1. Create a “quotation sandwich” out of one of the pieces of evidence.

/in /by

For this Writer’s Notebook assignment, you will be practicing paraphrasing, summarizing, and quoting. First, you should choose an article that you will be using as a source for your Argument essay. Then, you should find three different pieces of evidence that you might use in your essay as support material. Complete the Writer’s Notebook in 4 steps as explained below:1. Create a “quotation sandwich” out of one of the pieces of evidence. 2. Paraphrase a different piece of evidence. Include both the original and your paraphrase for comparison.3. Summarize another piece of evidence. Again, include the original and your summary.4. Include an in-text citation for each! At the end, be sure to include a Works Cited entry for each source. Need 300 words.

My topic is Genetically Modified Foods should choose at least one source from the library . see link below.https://dcccd.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-12420191-dt-content-rid-95160835_1/courses/2018SP-ENGL-1301-83420/Finding%2520Research%2520at%2520DCCCD%5B1%5D%281%29.pdfSources:

Integrating Sources

Why integrate sources? In academic writing, you will often present claims based on your own research and analysis. In order to prove or advance these claims, you may need to use evidence from sources. Evidence are those things outside of our own mind (facts, figures, reports, books, etc.) that support the reasons we present to make our claim. Integrating information from sources helps you to:

  • Strengthen your own argument / claim / position,
  • Identify others’ ideas, and
  • Establish your ethos / credibility.

When selecting information to use as evidence, it is important to:

  • Utilize the latest, most significant and credible sources that engage with the topic at hand.
  • Use sources to show your readers where you fit in with other writers in the larger conversation about your topic.
  • Use sources that show your readers you are up to date and knowledgeable about your topic.

Ways to Integrate Sources

It is important to know how to effectively integrate sources into your own writing. Generally speaking, there are three ways to integrate sources into your writing. Whenever you integrate sourced information it is important to frame it, which means, you should introduce the information in your own words, insert the sourced information, and follow it with your own interpretation or analysis. A common approach is regularly referred to as the “sandwich approach.”

Making Connections

Be sure that your reader understands why you have integrated the sourced information.  To help the reader follow your logic, you should make connections.

  • Point the reader back to the thesis
  • Point the reader back to the paragraph’s main point
  • Point the reader back to your purpose

Revising and Editing Your Text

When you are revising/editing your paper, answer the following questions to ensure that you have effectively integrated your sourced information.

  • Did you use a direct quote?  If so, did you place it within quotation marks?
  • Did you place your parenthetical/in-text citation immediately after your sourced information?
  • Does your citation include all of the required elements?
  • Does the ending punctuation follow the parenthetical/in-text citation?

Citing Integrated Sources

Whenever you integrate sources, you must document the source. Doing so helps to establish credibility and avoid plagiarism.Generally, parenthetical/in-text citations require the following components:

  • Author’s last name and
  • page number.

Example: (Green 210)Just as with most things, there are exceptions.

  • Signal Phrase – A signal phrase is an introductory clause that introduces information from sources.  It alerts the reader that you are shifting from your own point of view to someone else’s. When the author’s name is included in the signal phrase, you only need to include the page number in the parenthetical/in-text citation.

Example: According to Charles Green, “televisions are going to have a significant impact on the way people experience the world” (210).

  • Second consecutive use of same source – When using the same source consecutively, you only need to include the page number in the parenthetical/in-text citation.

In Summary

There are three main ways to integrate sources into your paper:

  • Direct quote
  • Summary
  • Paraphrase

Remember:

  • All three methods require citations
  • When integrating sources, it is important to “frame” the information
  • Sourced information should be used as evidence, not to replace your own thoughts or ideas

A Good Society Write an essay on the topic by defining the key concept, contrasting major philisophical theories and recommending your perspective. Use the following format: 1. Introduce the topic and set forth your key values or criteria for a good society. 2. Explain the difference between Plato’s theory and Aristotle’s. 3. Contrast the perspectives of Marx and Mill.

/in /by

A Good Society

Write an essay on the topic by defining the key concept, contrasting major philisophical theories and recommending your perspective.  Use the following format:

1. Introduce the topic and set forth your key values or criteria for a good society.

2. Explain the difference between Plato’s theory and Aristotle’s.

3. Contrast the perspectives of Marx and Mill.

4. Explain the contrasts between Rawl’s theory and Nozick’s theory.

5. Conclude by answering the following questions:

a) How would you rank order the criteria of social order, individual freedom, economic productivity and economic equality.

b) Which philosopher is linked to each criterion?

c) Are these criteria or values sufficient to define a good society?

d) Is anything lacking?

e) How should we improve our society?

How did some urban housing reforms of the late nineteenth century eventually add to urban blight? Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of progressivism

/in /by

There are four sections in this exam, with four questions each .You are required to answer only one question in each section. Be sure to include as much information as possible to support your answer. Each answer should be 3-5 paragraphs in length. Be sure to cite your sources.

Below are the four questions that need to be answered. Each are their own separate three to five paragraph answers.

How did some urban housing reforms of the late nineteenth century eventually add to urban blight?

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of progressivism

Many historians feel that Harry Truman as much as Joe McCarthy gave force to the postwar “Red Scare.” Explain why you agree or disagree.

. Describe the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade; then defend or criticize it.

For this assignment I am asking you to demonstrate that you have started to read and take notes from the sources listed in the bibliographies you turned in two weeks ago. From each of you I want the source information and an annotation of at least six sources.

/in /by

For this assignment I am asking you to demonstrate that you have started to read and take notes from the sources listed in the bibliographies you turned in two weeks ago. From each of you I want the source information and an annotation of at least six sources.

How To Prepare an Annotated Bibliography

Sources

 

1. Locke, Alain. “Enter the New Negro.” Survey Graphic, March 1925

http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai3/migrations/text8/lockenewnegro.pdf

2.   Graham, Maryemma. “The New Negro Renaissance.” University of Kansas Press

http://exhibitions.nypl.org/africanaage/essay-renaissance.html

3.

“Articles.” The Harlem Renaissance: What Was It, and Why Does It Matter? | 

Humanities Texas,

www.humanitiestexas.org/news/articles/harlem-renaissance-what-was-it-and-why

-does-it-matter.

4.

Faturoti, Ambrose. Renaissance Collage – Locke and the New Negro,

xroads.virginia.edu/~MA03/faturoti/harlem/collage/locke.html.

5.

“Harlem Renaissance.” YouTube, YouTube, 1 May 2014,

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3ozfYC9CZE.

6. http://www.americansc.org.uk/online/online_2013/harlem.Html